Visualizing The Risk Of Running Out Of Money In Retirement
Published Friday, March 25, 2016 at: 7:00 AM EDT
And when you plan your retirement, you can't afford to run out of money.
Israelsen back-tested the survival rates of four retirement portfolios based on 90 years of historical data.
In contrast, a four-asset diversified retirement portfolio lasted at least 35 years 98.2% of the time.
To be clear, there were 56 rolling calendar-year 35-year periods between 1926 and 2015. The first 35-year period was from 1926 through 1960, the second was from 1927 to 1961, and so on.
The numbers in the table represent the percentage of time that these four retirement portfolios lasted at least 35 years over the past 90 years – after initial annual withdrawals of 3% to 8%, and 3% cost-of-living adjustments annually to keep up with inflation.
This table is the traditional way to illustrate the survival rates of different portfolios. While the table is very helpful, this is not the only way of visualizing your risk of running out of money in retirement, and it is not the best way.
What this table does NOT show is how long portfolios survived when they didn't last at least 35 years. You have no idea whether a portfolio that failed the 35-year test survived 34, 30, or only 20 years.
That's where this new way of visualizing your retirement portfolio comes in.
Each dot in green in the all-10-Year U.S. Treasury bond portfolio represents one rolling period in the 35-year lifespan of that portfolio.
Each dot in purple represents one rolling period in the 35-year lifespan of that portfolio, which is 65% in the Standard & Poor's 500 index and 35% in 10-year Treasury bonds. The dots on the outer red ring survived 35 years or longer.
As the dots cave in toward the center, it indicates that during that particular 35-year period, the retirement portfolio lasted less than 35 years. The black circles indicate 30-year, 20-year and less survival periods. Look how many of the all-bond portfolios failed to last 35 years.
Not only are they far from the 35-year survival period but many of the 56 rolling periods lasted less than 25 years. Keep in mind, these two graphs assume an initial withdrawal rate of 4% that is adjusted for inflation by 3% annually.
In contrast, the 65/35 portfolio experienced very little "caving-in" with the same 5% initial withdrawal rate.
Historically, a diversified 65/35 portfolio has been able to survive for at least 35-years far more often than an all-bond retirement portfolio.
But this new data visualization can be helpful in understanding the risk of running out of money in late in life.
If you have any questions or would like to get personal retirement income planning advice, we are here for you any time.
Large cap US stocks represented by Standard & Poor’s 500 Index; small cap US stock represented by Ibbotson Small Stock Index from, 1926-1978 and Russell 2000 Index from 1979-2015; US bonds represented by Ibbotson US Intermediate Government Bond Index from 1926-1975, Barclay’s Capital Aggregate Bond Index from 1976-2015; cash represented by 90-day Treasury Bills from 1926-2015.
This article was written by a veteran financial journalist based on data compiled and analyzed by independent economist, Fritz Meyer. While these are sources we believe to be reliable, the information is not intended to be used as financial advice without consulting a professional about your personal situation. Indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Investments with higher return potential carry greater risk for loss. Past performance is not an indicator of your future results.
This article was written by a veteran financial journalist based on data compiled and analyzed by independent economist, Fritz Meyer. While these are sources we believe to be reliable, the information is not intended to be used as financial advice without consulting a professional about your personal situation.
Indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Investments with higher return potential carry greater risk for loss. Past performance is not an indicator of your future results.
- Why The New Bull Market Theory Was In The News This Past Week
- Strong Jobs Report Caps A Week For The Record Books
- Why Stocks Rose Friday Despite A Rise In Inflation In April
- Weekly Investor Update
- The Confluence Of Bad News For Recent Retirees And Those About To Retire
- Good And Bad News This Week For Investors
- Getting There: The Economic Balancing Act Progressed In March
- Stocks Gained Friday But Closed Fractionally Lower For The Week
- Good News On Inflation But A Recession May Be Hard To Avoid
- Analysis: The First Data Since The Banking Crisis Erupted In March
- Stocks Gained 7% First Quarter And Other Good Financial News
- Despite Bank Fears And A Fed Hike, Stocks Climbed For The Week
- Bank Panic And Strong 1Q '23 Economic Growth
- Mixed Economic Signals And A Bank Failure
- Service Sector Remained Strong In February, Soothing Investors For Now
- Inflation Rose In January, Indicating Tight Monetary Policy May Continue Into 2024
- Amid Divergent Data, Here's What To Know
- Optimistic Again, Will A Fed Algorithm Be Right Again?
- The Bipolar Economy Of 2023
- On Wednesday, We’ll Know If The Federal Reserve Will End Inflation By Causing A Recession
- Technology Drove S&P 500 1.9% Higher Friday, But Look At Tech's Terrible 2022 Loss
- Here What To Know To Invest Wisely
- Prudence Requires Positioning Portfolios For An Economic Expansion